Showing posts with label Washington Consensus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington Consensus. Show all posts

Thursday, August 8, 2024

Criticism of Ethiopia's Agreement with the IMF

 Ethiopia Insight published on 8 August 2024 a commentary titled "The Addis-Washington Consensus and Its Democratic Deficit" by Fassil Hailu, a pen name for a columnist with Ethiopia Insight.

The $3.4 billion International Monetary Fund agreement with Ethiopia requires a number of economic reforms.  The author believes that the Ethiopian government is captive to the IMF for the entire duration of the reform package and that the Fund enjoys undue influence.   

Friday, August 30, 2019

How the China Model Plays in Africa

Asia Dialogue published on 27 August 2019 a commentary titled "The Chinese Model in Africa and Its Wider Challenge" by Tom Harper, University of Surrey.

The author argues that the principal advocates of the Chinese model in Africa are not Chinese elites but leaders in Africa such as South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa. He adds that the Chinese model comes with both a vision for economic development and financial resources to back it up.

Friday, March 1, 2019

China Becomes More Activist in Middle East and North Africa

The Diplomat published on 25 February 2019 an analysis titled "China's Rise in the Middle East: Beyond Economics" by Nicholas Lyall, an Amman-based researcher.

The author looks at China's recent engagement in the Middle East, North Africa and the Horn of Africa and concludes that it is moving away from its traditional position of disengagement on security issues and increasingly willing to take a position of leadership.

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

China-Africa Telecommunication Relationship

The African Journal of Information and Communication published in 2016 a study titled "China and Africa: Alternative Telecommunication Policies and Practices" by Ewan Sutherland.

The author notes that China has not exported its domestic model of competing state-owned telecommunications operators, nor have those operators followed the "going out" strategy. China has won from hardware sales in Africa, while Africans have won wider access to telecommunications, including states rejecting the Washington Consensus model.

Friday, August 28, 2015

China and African Peace Operations

The first issue of the China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies published in April 2015 contains an article titled "Chinese Peace? An emergent Norm in African Peace Operations" by Steven C.Y. Kuo, analyst at Control Risks in Johannesburg.

The article highlights differences, identifies tensions, and recognizes complementarities between the dominant liberal and the emergent Chinese approach to peace building.  There is a special emphasis on Chinese peace operations in Liberia.  You can access a PDF version of the article by simply registering with the journal, which is published by the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

African Economies and the Future

This Is Africa, supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, recently published a series of brief commentaries titled "Building Inclusive Economies: Can Africa Bridge the Development Divide?" by a number of experts.  They provide some insightful comments on the future of African economies.

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Chinese vs. Western Development Model in Africa

PRAXIS: The Fletcher Journal of Human Security published in 2012 an article titled "China in Africa: What the Policy of Nonintervention Adds to the Western Development Dilemma." The author is Madison Condon, a joint J.D./MALD candidate between Harvard Law School and the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

Madison Condon/LinkedIn
The article makes the point that Chinese loans and investments are typically made in exchange for securing access to natural resources. Based on its principles of nonintervention and respect for sovereignty, "China gives this money with little or no strings attached."

The author argues that the Chinese model is a legitimate challenger to Western aid.

While the article contains some annoying imprecision as it intermingles investment, loans and aid, it does offer a useful juxtaposition of the so-called Washington and Beijing Consensus models.